Even just a few years ago product development meant mainly working with your hands and your engineering degree to build and test physical products. But nowadays many products are virtual think apps, software, and websites so tech skills are needed to create and evaluate them. Product managers and testers fill those roles. Writing and tech might seem as far apart as the North and South Poles but one of the most up-and-coming areas in the digital space is content marketing.
The goal of online content is to make a connection with customers through storytelling and sharing. So, if you know how to create engaging blog posts, videos, or graphics, there can be a place for you in content. And those digital talents, combined with your people skills and a knack for trending topics, will put you in high demand for roles in the growing field of social media. Turn your passion for beautiful things into a fabulous tech career in design.
Bonus: most are well-paying and exciting too! After doing this, you can probably use your social contacts to get a job with the local college as a programmer and that's your best bet. As a programmer you can also take some IT classes as electives, and you may be able to work for the IT department as well with these classes taken. The bottom line is, try to do whatever it takes to get a job within your school, because that's your best bet.
Also, if you are on probation, don't tell your probation officer that you have a job in the school until about a month to a month and a half after you get it. My father made this mistake and the probation officer called my father's job and ruined his reputation. The probation officer basically called and told my father's employer that my dad was a no-good, dirty crook, just to screw him over. Now of course, they might do a background check before they hire you, and that will make you look bad, but again, if you get in good with your professors and the computing department in your school, then they may just over look that.
Recent Activity Computer Science and Music? Double Major?taalidisealug.ga
Job Opportunities | Jobs @ Bellevue College
Help understanding college math program rankings. Math Major questions. Best Schools For Me.
- el paso texas divorce records!
- cell phone java books free download.
- Join Our Talent Network?
- property status change search las vegas.
- Computer science and a felony? — College Confidential?
- criminals near rich hill road pa.
State schools with extreme CS weed out. College Dropout Considering Going Back long post. How hard is it to get into University of Washington computer science without Direct to Admissions? Note that if you still smoke you should consider stopping or getting a prescription as some larger companies require drug tests. SwellJoe on Nov 17, I've noticed a common trend among several convicted felons in my friend circle I lead an interesting life that, in a lot of cases, they're still punishing themselves, sometimes decades later. It's a self-reinforcing cycle One friend, however, has had a lot of years to deal with it he was convicted of drug trafficking and spent several years incarcerated , and has started to come out the other side.
When asked about his conviction, he's not cagey about it, or apologetic about it, but he also doesn't go overboard with explanations. He simply says what happened and that he hasn't had any trouble with the law, or with drugs, since. Besides, this is for pot. Nobody in California cares about pot, so most of the companies he wants to work for aren't going to care that much about a pot conviction.
Apple might because I feel like they might be hypocritical enough to judge someone for being involved with a drug that one of the founders of the company was known to be very fond of , but I doubt Google would but, maybe I'm wrong, I don't have any insight into the Google hiring process these days and don't have any inside people to ask. But, I would definitely trim down the sad sack tale. Just state the facts of what the conviction was for like "I sold a gram of pot to my roommate in college" or whatever , and that you've had no run-ins with the law since.
If I were in a hiring position and I have been in the past, and likely will in the future , I wouldn't consider this relevant, at all, to the decision. And, I'd probably even accept a lot "worse" kinds of felony than this. That may be because of my current experience with friends who have a felony in their past and with my level of knowledge of how the system works, and who the system targets for example, white folks are far less likely to be convicted on felony charges than black folks for the same crimes, so black folks are far more likely to have a criminal record, even if they just did the same sorts of things me and all my white friends did growing up.
Yes, I agree. I think the version I gave was a bit more "theatrical" because I was writing it out for a non-employer. And no I don't use illegal drugs - and am not a heavy drinker. I have coped with depression and anxiety with the help of psychotherapy and anti-depression drugs. Which have worked very well, and helped me lead a balanced and healthy life.
Don't mention depression or your treatment for mental illness or use of psychotropic medications. There is still serious stigma against mental illness. DanBC on Nov 17, People with a mental illness are covered under discrimination laws in the US. While it's probably a good idea to not disclose in the US before you have the job it's something that people need to think about. The EEOC advice is here.
Wondering if tech is right for you?
I take a "less is more approach" if someone asks: Were you depressed? I say: "Absolutely, I had just experienced a parents suicide" and I've done a lot of work on learning adult coping skills so that I won't repeat that sort of thing. Again this is all if they ask It's a weird cross section because once the door is open, someone can ask pretty much any question they may have been legally prohibited from asking in an interview because I disclosed it - I often feel it changes the dynamic of an interview in a very serious way.
I usually try to use it is an op. It's also worth noting that there is some movement towards preventing businesses from asking about convictions until after a conditional offer has been extended, and then putting some burden on them to demonstrate relevance before they rescind the offer. So, under that rule, someone whose felony was embezzlement can be rescinded from a bank job, but a pot conviction shouldn't matter for a programming position. I don't see why this is a good thing.
One of the consequences of committing a crime is that your conviction becomes part of the public record. I am all for trying to convince employers that certain past crimes are not relevant for employment, if that is really the case. But I don't see why the government should be forcing employers to ignore past convictions, or why employers should have to prove that the information is relevant. Of all the categories we might seek to protect, be it race, gender, religion, etc. A significant percentage of felony convictions are for nonviolent drug offenses.
In a world where the government stays out of free trade of goods between people, those convictions wouldn't have happened, at all.
Job Openings at Code.org
And, as others have mentioned, selecting for criminal background is effectively racial profiling, when implemented on a large scale. Blacks are convicted at a rate several times that of whites for the same crimes; not because they commit more of those crimes, but because they are arrested more often, they are convicted more often, and they are imprisoned more often. Time in American prisons virtually guarantees re-offending which is a whole discussion unto itself.
So, white kids who get caught and don't end up being run through the prison system getting off with community service or similar , get to escape the system before it escalates to felony charges, in a lot of cases. Whether my reasoning, if applied consistently, would have implications for drug laws is not really relevant to this debate.
The question to me is, given that we have decided to make certain things illegal, should we restrict employer's ability to make use of the public information about which laws people have broken. If particular laws are unjust that should be dealt with by changing those laws. The arguments that convictions can be used as a proxy for race is weak for two reasons.
- High Paying Jobs For Felons: How to Get Hired in an IT Industry;
- Job Snapshot.
- Assistant Professor, Computer Science;
- jackson county wv police arrest records!
- where can i find the chinese symbol for friendship?
- Replies to: Computer science and a felony?.
First, the crimes that are most prone to racial bias are also the least serious crimes and therefore the least likely to appear on a background test. Second, not much quantitative evidence has been given on how much the conviction rates for Blacks is distorted, relative to the true ratio of rates of crime. SwellJoe on Nov 18, So you have interpreted me wrong, which seems to be a recurring pattern here.
I am saying that while there may be discrimination, it's not clear how much this discrimination is able to account for different rates of convictions, and how much is due to Blacks committing more crime. You seem to have ignored my point about the discrimination being greatest for less serious crimes a point made in the article you linked. The article also claims that even these crimes can be a problem for job seekers, however I think the effect is smaller, in terms of how long it stays on a person's record, whether it appears on a background check, and how employers would react.
Apologies for misinterpreting you. Here in the UK, the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act means you only have to declare a criminal conviction for a specified period three to ten years, depending on your sentence. Exemptions exist for certain professions, mainly those involving vulnerable people such as medicine and teaching.
IMHO this approach strikes a very good compromise - it allows for reformed criminals to re-integrate into society, without allowing recidivists to hide their criminal past. I think that in the context of the US, this would correspond to removing certain crimes from a person's record after a given amount of time.